Skip to main content

Nuggets of Jude

Jude is an underated book. It is written (so I think) by Jesus' brother Jude. He describes himself as a slave (doulos) of Jesus Christ and James' brother. It is written to some unspecified Christians described as the called, the loved by God, and kept by Jesus Christ. His recipients are afflicted by false teachers against whom Jude encourages them to contend for the faith. These false teachers are infiltrating the flock and are now condemned. They are godless and distort an authentic Christian doctrine of grace into a freedom to be sexually immoral and deny Jesus Christ as King and Lord.

Jude appeals to OT and apocalyptic examples of God's judgement. These include the Exodus, angels, Sodom and Gomorrah. These are examples of those who will suffer eternal punishment. These false teachers too are unholy, reject authority and slander celestial beings. Jude warns them with the example of Michael who when disputing with Satan over Moses' body, did not dare to slander Satan. These false teachers however are happy to speak abusively and will be destroyed. Jude sees them as going the same way as Cain who killed Abel, Balaam and Korah; all OT examples of opponents of God.

These false teachers abuse the fellowship and Lord's Supper gatherings and meals. Jude has nothing positive to say about them with vivid language, speaking of their death: 'they are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted—twice dead!'

He appeals to the book of Enoch warning of God's judgement.

He appeals to his readers to withstand these false teachers.

My interest in this blog for the next few entries is vs20-25; a brilliant set of injunctions and encouragements in the faith.

The first is this: Verse 20: 'But you, dear friends, build yourselves up in your most holy faith and pray in the Holy Spirit.'

'Friends' here is 'beloved' from the Greek agape. 'Build yourselves up' suggests that we are to take personal responsibility for our own faith. For these readers, as they face false teaching, they are to take personal responsibility to grow! How do we do this? Clearly, through reading Scripture, theological reflection, reading books that grow us, fellowship that builds and encourages, prayer i.e. a devotional life that sustains. We are not then to blame others and fail to take responsibility for ourselves; we are to take personal responsibility for our own faith and its growth. 'Most holy faith' points to our belief. We are not to stray into ideas that erode our faith but remain focussed on 'the faith', that which is orthodox and which deepens our commitment and belief.

As a young Christian I was taught this verse by a friend, and it has resonated within my spirit ever since. I don't blame others when I face struggles, I take responsibility. If the preaching at church is a bit pallad and unimpressive, I take responsibility getting good books, reading the word and taking personal responsibility. Too many of us Christians blame the preacher, blame the church, blame the worship or whatever. We are responsible before God for our own faith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ten Reasons Why A.J. Miller is NOT Jesus!

Note: Forgive me for the long blog, but this one really got me going! Last Sunday night on TV One's Sunday aired the report A.J. The Messiah. The program was the story of A.J. Miller in Queensland in Australia, who, unlike most of us, genuinely believes that he is Jesus. Miller appears at one level to be a normal Aussie bloke, in his early thirties, longish brown hair, unshaven, good looking, articulate and charismatic. Yet, unlike anyone I know but in the manner of other Messiah-claimants, he says without inhibition, "I am actually Jesus." He claims to remember vividly his former life and death including his experience of crucifixion. The memories supposedly began when he was 2 years old and realised later that he was Jesus around 33. In the program he writes on a white-board, "I am Jesus. Deal with it"—to applause from his congregation. He has disciples, some of whom claim to have been with him 2000 years ago including Mary Magdalene who is his "soul-ma

Tribute to Stuart Lange

For anyone who is interested, I have attached my tribute to Rev Stuart Lange here. He is a legend! It was fun to roast him.... A Tribute to Stuart Lange, No Longer Vice Principal Community of Laidlaw… But still church history lecturer… so not a good bye, but my way of Saying Thanks to you for your years as VP Community… Stuart Lange, not Langey; or Longey; or not langgggg.. but Lange! Or, as I like to put it, S.lang… Slang… for good reason. Stuart Lange, history prof, a man who truly embodies his subject; the quintessential historical prof… Slightly eccentric, crooked smile, hooked and bent nose… you know he has a crook elbow too, took the dog for a walk, hit the chain, smashed the elbow… Of course the dog was unharmed… No Surprise, a lover of animals, each year looking after the animals at the Massey Christmas drive through, donkeys, lamas… etc… Then there is his Einsteinlich hair… kind of a wild man of Southland look… in fact… Stuart Lange A face a cartoonist would die for! The ne

Evangelical Presbyterians’ Statement On Same Sex Marriage

I am involved in a group called Presbyterian Affirm. It is an evangelical group within the NZ Presbyterian Church which seeks to promote the gospel and the renewal of churches. A group of us under the leadership of Stuart Lange have worked to put together a statement on same-sex marriage. Our hope is that the government will not pass the legislation, believing that the legislation is not necessary and strays from God’s ideals for humanity. Here is the recently released statement. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. PRESBYTERIAN GROUP OPPOSES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BILL Presbyterian AFFIRM, a widely-supported conservative network within the Presbyterian denomination, is speaking out against the Bill which would allow same-sex couples to marry, declaring its views in a “Statement on Marriage” (see below). Presbyterian AFFIRM believes that “marriage is a unique human institution and treasure” which has “always been about the pairing of a man and a woman”, and that re-definin